Núm. 52 (2020)
Artículos

Development of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Women and Men. A Study from the Institutional Perspective

PDF (English) HTML (English) XML (English)
Sin título (English)
  • Neftali Parga-Montoya,
  • Héctor Cuevas-Vargas
Neftali Parga-Montoya
Autonomous University of Aguascalientes
Biografía
Héctor Cuevas-Vargas
Universidad Tecnológica del Suroeste de Guanajuato
Biografía
Publicado enero 31, 2020

Derechos de autor 2020 Economía teoría y práctica

Creative Commons License
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Resumen

We examine the regulatory, normative and cognitive burdens to define the current institutional framework, then we established the potential influence on the individual entrepreneurial orientation, given this, our study explore the differences between male and female entrepreneurship in order to identify the main problem in gender role. Our methodology was PLS-SEM applying a comparative method in 250 Mexican entrepreneurs. The findings show that disparity between genders is defined by a stronger normative male role, inferring a hostile context for women entrepreneurs. Also, the taking-risk skills are higher than men which it implies a proclivity to react a hazardous motivations for women. This study attempts to fill the recurrent role of women on economic field as crucial to build a balanced institutional context based on legal protection, social certainty and business social skills to confront the market in the most innovative, proactive and assertive way.

PDF (English) HTML (English) XML (English)
Sin título (English)

Citas

  1. Acs, Zoltan J., & Amorós, José Ernesto. (2008). Entrepreneurship and competitiveness dynamics in Latin America. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 305-322. doi:10.1007/s11187-008-9133-y
  2. Ahl, Helene. (2006). Why Research on Women Entrepreneurs Needs New Directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595-621. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.x
  3. Aldrich, Howard, & Zimmer, Catherine. (1986). Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks (Vol. 33).
  4. Angulo-Guerrero, María, Pérez-Moreno, Salvador, & Abad-Guerrero, Isabel. (2017). How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries. Journal of Business Research(73), 30-37.
  5. Aparicio, Sebastian, Urbano, David, & Audretsch, David. (2016). Institutional factors opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence. Technological Forecasting & Social Change(102), 45-61.
  6. Ayuntamiento de Aguascalientes. (2017). Abre Municipio de Aguascalientes nuevas oportunidades en créditos para mujeres y jóvenes emprendedores. Aguascalientes, México Retrieved from http://www.ags.gob.mx/cont.aspx?p=5119.
  7. Battilana, Julie, Leca, Bernard, & Boxenbaum, Eva. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Sitio web de la Faculty & Research de la Harvard Business School. http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=36607
  8. Bolton, Dawn Langkamp. (2012). Individual entrepreneurial orientation: Further investigation of a measurement instrument. Academy of entrepreneurship journal, 18(1), 91.
  9. Bowen, Donald D., & Hisrich, Robert D. (1986). The Female Entrepreneur: A Career Development Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 393-407. doi:10.2307/258468
  10. Bowen, Harry, & De Clercq, Dirk. (2008). Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 747-767.
  11. Buttner, E. Holly, & Rosen, Benson. (1988). Bank loan officers' perceptions of the characteristics of men, women, and successful entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(3), 249-258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(88)90018-3
  12. Clark, Lee Anna, & Watson, David. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological assessment, 7(3), 309.
  13. Cohen, Jacob. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ, 20-26.
  14. Covin, Jeffrey, & Slevin, Dennis. (1989). Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75-87.
  15. Cronbach, Lee J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
  16. Cuevas-Vargas, Héctor. (2016). La influencia de la innovación y la tecnología en la competitividad de las Pymes manufactureras del estado de Aguascalientes. (Ph.D.), Universidad Autonoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
  17. Chasserio, Stephanie, Poroli, Corinne, & Pailot, Philippe. (2016). La construction de la légitimité des femmes entrepreneures : une approche transactionnelle. 20(4), 45.
  18. Chin, Wynne W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (Vol. 295, pp. 295-336). New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  19. Chowdhury, Farzana, & Audretsch, David Bruce. (2014). Institution as looting apparatus: impact of gender equality and institutions on female entrepreneurship. Eurasian Business Review, 4(2), 207-225. doi:10.1007/s40821-014-0008-7
  20. Danis, Wade, De Clercq, Dirk, & Petricevic, Olga. (2011). Are social networks more important for new business activity in emerging than developed economies? An empirical extension. International Business Review, 20, 394-408.
  21. Dawn Langkamp, Bolton, & Michelle, D. Lane. (2012). Individual entrepreneurial orientation: development of a measurement instrument. Education + Training, 54(2/3), 219-233. doi:10.1108/00400911211210314
  22. De Clercq, Dirk, Danis, Wade, & Dakhli, Mourad. (2010). The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies. International Business Review, 19, 85-101.
  23. De Clercq, Dirk, Meuleman, Miguel, & Wright, Mike. (2012). A cross-country investigation of micro-angel investment activity: The roles of new business opportunities and institutions. International Business Review, 21, 117-129.
  24. De Vita, Luisa, Mari, Michela, & Poggesi, Sara. (2014). Women entrepreneurs in and from developing countries: Evidences from the literature. European Management Journal, 32(3), 451-460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.07.009
  25. DeCarlo, James F, & Lyons, Paul R. (1979). A Comparison of Selected Personal Characteristics of Minority and Non-Minority Female Entrepreneurs. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
  26. DiMaggio, Paul, & Powell, Walter. (1983:148). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
  27. Dwairi, Musa, & Akour, Iman. (2014). The moderating role of country institutional profile on the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationships in the service industry. International Journal of Business, Marketing, & Decision Science, 7(1), 80-94.
  28. Eunni, Rangamohan, & Manolova, Tatiana. (2012). Are the BRIC economies entrepreneur-friendly? An Institutional Perspective. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 20(2), 171-202.
  29. Fornell, Claes, & Larcker, David. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  30. Gartner, William B. (1988). “Who Is an Entrepreneur?” Is the Wrong Question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11-32. doi:10.1177/104225878801200401
  31. Gohar, Madiha, & Abrar, Ayesha. (2016). Embedded or Constrained Informal Institutional Influences on Women Entrepreneurship Development in Pukhtoon Culture. 10(2), 80.
  32. Gold, Andrew H, & Arvind Malhotra, Albert H Segars. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of management information systems, 18(1), 185-214.
  33. Goltz, Sonia, Buche, Mari W., & Pathak, Saurav. (2015). Political Empowerment, Rule of Law, and Women's Entry into Entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(3), 605-626. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12177
  34. Gomes, Almiralva Ferraz, Santana, Weslei Gusmão Piau, Araújo, Uajará Pessoa, & Martins, Caroline Miriã Fontes. (2014). Female Entrepreneurship as Subject of Research. 2014, 16(51), 24. doi:10.7819/rbgn.v16i51.1508
  35. Greer, Margaret J, & Greene, Patricia G. (2003). Feminist theory and the study of entrepreneurship. New perspectives on women entrepreneurs, 1-24.
  36. Gupta, Vishal K., Guo, Chun, Canever, Mario, Yim, Hyung Rok, Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur, & Liu, Ming. (2014). Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(2), 367-384. doi:10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8
  37. Gupta, Vishal K., Niranjan, Suman, Goktan, Banu A., & Eriskon, John. (2016). Individual entrepreneurial orientation role in shaping reactions to new technologies. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(4), 935-961. doi:10.1007/s11365-015-0373-4
  38. Hair, Joseph F, Anderson, R E, Tatham, R L, & Black, W C. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  39. Hair, Joseph F, Sarstedt, Marko, Ringle, Christian M, & Mena, Jeannette A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(3), 414-433.
  40. Hechavarria, Diana M., & Reynolds, Paul D. (2009). Cultural norms & business start-ups: the impact of national values on opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(4), 417. doi:10.1007/s11365-009-0115-6
  41. Henseler, Jörg, Ringle, Christian M, & Sarstedt, Marko. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135.
  42. Hisrich, Robert D., & Ayse Öztürk, Sevgi. (1999). Women entrepreneurs in a developing economy. Journal of Management Development, 18(2), 114-125. doi:doi:10.1108/02621719910257639
  43. Iakovleva, Tatiana, Solesvik, Marina, & Trifilova, Anna. (2013). Financial availability and government support for women entrepreneurs in transitional economies: Cases of Russia and Ukraine. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(2), 314-340. doi:doi:10.1108/14626001311326752
  44. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2015, 2015). Directorio Estadístico Nacional de Unidades Económicas. Retrieved from http://www3.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/mapa/denue/
  45. Kline, RB. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn Guilford Press. New York.
  46. Kollmann, Tobias, Stöckmann, Christoph, Meves, Yvonne, & Kensbock, Julia M. (2017). When members of entrepreneurial teams differ: linking diversity in individual-level entrepreneurial orientation to team performance. Small Business Economics, 48(4), 843-859. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9818-6
  47. Kostova, Tatiana, & Roth, Kendall. (2002). Adoption of an Organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects. Academy of Management, 45(1), 215-233.
  48. Langevang, Thilde, Gough, Katherine V., Yankson, Paul W. K., Owusu, George, & Osei, Robert. (2015). Bounded Entrepreneurial Vitality: The Mixed Embeddedness of Female Entrepreneurship. Economic Geography, 91(4), 449-473. doi:10.1111/ecge.12092
  49. Lohmöller, Jan-Bernd. (2013). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares: Springer Science & Business Media.
  50. Machado, Hilka Pelizza Vier, Gazola, Sebastião, Fabricio, Joiceli Dos Santos, & Anez, Miguel Eduardo Moreno. (2016). Women Entrepreneurs: Reasons and Difficulties for Starting in Business. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17, 15-38.
  51. Manolova, Tatiana, Rangamohan, Eunni, & Gyoshev, Bojidar. (2008). Institutional Environments for Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Emerging Economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 32(1), 203-218. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00222.x
  52. Martin, Hélène. (2013). Le changement social et la rhétorique traditionaliste : La qualification sociale de l’entrepreneuriat féminin à l’intersection des rapports sociaux de sexe, de classe et de colonialité. Recherches féministes, 26(2), 165-182.
  53. National Banking and Securities Commission. (2013). Encuesta Nacional de Competitividad, Fuentes de Financiamiento y Uso de Servicios Financieros de las Empresas. Retrieved from México, México: http://www.cnbv.gob.mx/Prensa/Estudios/Reporte%20de%20la%20ENAFIN.pdf
  54. National Institute of Statistics and Geography. (2015). Encuesta Nacional de Financiamiento de las Empresas. Retrieved from México, México: http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/proyectos/encestablecimientos/especiales/enafin/
  55. North, Douglass. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  56. Nunnally, Jum. (2009). Teoría Psicométrica. México: Trillas.
  57. Richomme-Huet, Katia, & d’Andria, Aude. (2013). L’accompagnement entrepreneurial par et pour les mampreneurs. Management international, 17(3), 100-111.
  58. Ringle, Christian M, Sarstedt, Marko, & Straub, Detmar. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly.
  59. Ringle, Christian M, Wende, Sven, & Becker, Jan-Michael. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH, http://www. smartpls. com.
  60. Safina, Ferdous. (2016). Women entrepreneurship in Bangladesh: Problems & Prospects. ASA University Review, 10(1).
  61. Sarstedt, Marko, Henseler, Jörg, & Ringle, Christian M. (2011). Multigroup Analysis in Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling: Alternative Methods and Empirical Results Measurement and Research Methods in International Marketing (pp. 195-218).
  62. Scott, Richard. (2008). Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory. Theory adn Society, 37(5), 427-442.
  63. Scott, Richard. (2014). Institutions and Organizations. EUA: SAGE.
  64. Sonnenfeld, Jeffrey, & Kotter, John P. (1982). The Maturation of Career Theory. Human Relations, 35(1), 19-46. doi:10.1177/001872678203500103
  65. Sweeney, Joan Lourdes. (1985). Risk taking as a necessity for growth : a study of the perceptions and experiences of a sample of successful contemporary American women entrepreneurs. Doctoral Dissertations. University of Massachusetts Amherst. US. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/1602/
  66. Teo, Thompson SH, Srivastava, Shirish C, & Jiang, Li. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of management information systems, 25(3), 99-132.
  67. Terjesen, Siri, Bosma, Niels, & Stam, Erik. (2016). Advancing Public Policy for High-Growth, Female, and Social Entrepreneurs. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 230-239. doi:10.1111/puar.12472
  68. Urbano, David, & Álvarez, Claudia. (2014). Institutional dimensions and entrepreneurial activity: an international study. Small Business Economics(42), 703-716.
  69. Volchek, Daria, Saarenketo, Sami, & Jantunen, Ari. (2015). Structural Model of Institutional Environment Influence on International Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. In Svetla Marinova (Ed.), Institutional Impacts on Firm Internationalization (pp. 190-216). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  70. Wetzels, Martin, Odekerken-Schröder, Gaby, & Van Oppen, Claudia. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195.
  71. Yousafzai, Shumaila Y., Saeed, Saadat, & Muffatto, Moreno. (2015). Institutional Theory and Contextual Embeddedness of Women's Entrepreneurial Leadership: Evidence from 92 Countries. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(3), 587-604. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12179
  72. Zeineb, Demmene Debbih. (2015). Le rôle de la politique publique dans l’encouragement de l’entrepreneuriat féminin en Algérie: entre réalité et attentes. Revue Algérienne d’Economie et de Management N.
  73. Zimmer, Catherine. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. The art and science of entrepreneurship. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 3-23.