Núm. 44 (2016)
Artículos

Coordinación de la política monetaria entre dos bancos centrales: un análisis de teoría de juegos

Erick José Limas Maldonado
Freie Universität Berlin
Publicado junio 1, 2016
Palabras clave
  • bancos centrales,
  • política monetaria,
  • coordinación,
  • Nash,
  • Stackelberg,
  • teoría de juegos
  • ...Más
    Menos

Resumen

En este trabajo se analizan las condiciones bajo las cuales un país pequeño optaría por seguir un juego tipo Nash o uno de tipo Stackelberg. Para ello, se plantea un modelo de dos economías nacionales, con perturbaciones de oferta y demanda, en el cual el banco central de cada país tiene la tasa de interés como instrumento de política. Se muestra que, ante perturbaciones de la oferta, para el país pequeño es preferible la solución de Stackelberg, mientras que, si las perturbaciones son de la demanda, la solución preferible es la de Nash. Así, el punto clave sería determinar si las perturbaciones están induciendo o no un dilema en la función objetivo del banco central.

Citas

  1. Ball, Laurence (1999), "Policy rules for open economies", en John B. Taylor (ed.), Monetary Policy Rules, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, pp. 127-144.
  2. Barro, Robert J., y Gordon, B. David (1983), "Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy", Journal of Monetary Economics, 12 (1), pp. 1001-121.
  3. Blackburn, Keith, y Christensen, Michael (1989), "Monetary policy and policy credibility: theories and evidence", Journal of Economic Literature, 27 (1), pp. 1-45.
  4. Bonomo, Marco Antonio, y Brito, Ricardo R. (2001), "Regras Monetárias e Dinâmica Macroeconômica no Brasil: Uma Abordagem de Expectativas Racionais", Working Paper 28, Banco Central do Brasil,.
  5. Canzoneri, Matthew, y Gray, Jo Anna (1985), "Monetary policy games and the consequences of non-cooperative behavior", International Economic Review, 26 (3), pp. 547-564.
  6. Canzoneri, Matthew, y Henderson, Dale (1991), Monetary policy in interdependent economies: a game-theoretic approach, Cambridge, MIT press.
  7. Carraro, Carlo, y Giavazzi, Francesco (1988), "¿Can international policy coordination really be counterproductive?", NBER Working Paper Series 2669.
  8. Chang, Eui; Muinhos, Marcelo, y Teixeira Joanilio (2002), "Macroeconomic coordination and inflation targeting in a two-country model", Working Paper Series 50, Banco Central do Brasil.
  9. Clarida, Richard; Galí, Jordi, y Gertler, Mark (1999), "The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspectiva", Journal of Economic Literature, 37 (4), pp. 1661-1707.
  10. Díaz, Carmen (2005), "La política económica en una unión monetaria: ¿independencia o coordinación?", ICE Tribuna de Economía, 0 (824), pp. 191-207.
  11. Dixit, Avinash, y Lambertini, Luisa (1999), "Symbiosis of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in a Monetary Union", [pdf] Consultado el 24 de abril de 2016, en: http://ssrn.com/abstract=203628
  12. Ellison, Martin; Sarno, Lucio, y Vilmunen, Jouko (2007), "Caution or Activism? Monetary Policy Strategies in an Open Economy", Macroeconomic Dynamics, 11 (4), pp. 519-541.
  13. Fernández, Jorge (2002), Teoría de juegos: su aplicación en economía, México, Colmex.
  14. Frankel, Jeffrey, y Rockett, Katharine (1988), "International Macroeconomic Policy Coordination when Policymakers Disagree on the True Model", American Economic Review, 78 (3), pp. 318-340.
  15. Freitas, Paulo, y Muinhos, Marcelo (2001), "A Simple Model for Inflation Targeting in Brazil", Working Paper 18, Banco Central do Brasil.
  16. Fritz, Barbara, y Metzger, Martina (eds.) (2006), New Issues in Regional Monetary Coordination: Understanding North-South and South-South Arrangements, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Goodhart, Charles (1994), "Game Theory for Central Bankers: A Report to the Governor of the Bank of England", Journal of Economic Literature, 32 (1), pp. 101-114.
  18. Hamada, Koichi (1976), "A Strategic Analysis of Monetary Interdependence", Journal of Political Economy, 84 (4), pp. 677-700.
  19. Jensen, Henrik (1997), "Monetary Policy Cooperation May Not Be Counterproductive", The Scandinavian. Journal of Economics, 99 (1), pp. 73-80.
  20. Kempf, Hubert, y Thadden, Leopold (2008), "On policy interactions among nations: when do cooperation and commitment matter", Working Paper 196, Banque de France.
  21. Krolzig, Hans (1997), "International monetary policy coordination and credibility under incomplete information", Applied Economics Discussion Paper 193, Institute of Economics and Statistics, University of Oxford
  22. Leitemo, Kai (2004), "A game between the fiscal and the monetary authorities under inflation targeting", European Journal of Political Economy, 20 (3), pp. 709-724.
  23. Leitemo, Kai; Roisland, Oisten, y Torvik, Ragnar (2002), "Time inconsistency and the exchange rate channel of monetary policy", The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104 (3), pp. 391-397.
  24. Leitemo, Kai; Roisland, Oisten, y Torvik, Ragnar (2005), "Monetary policy rules and the exchange rate channel", Applied Financial Economics, 15 (16), pp. 1165-1170.
  25. Osborne, Martin, y Rubinstein, Ariel (1994), A course in game theory, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
  26. Petit, Maria Luisa (1989), "Fiscal and Monetary Policy Co-Ordination: A Differential Game Approach", Journal of Applied Econometrics, 4 (2), pp. 161-179.
  27. Rogoff, Kenneth (1985), "Can international monetary policy cooperation be counterproductive?", Journal of International Economics, 18 (3-4), pp. 199-217.
  28. Svensson, Lars (1999), "Inflation Targeting: Some Extensions", The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101 (3), pp, 337-361.
  29. Walsh, Carl (2003), Monetary theory and policy, 2a. ed., Cambridge, The MIT Press.
  30. Woodford, Michael (1998), "Optimal Monetary Policy Inertia", mimeo, Princeton University.