Núm. 30 (2009)
Artículos

A Microeconometric Analysis on the Pension Reforms in Argentina, Bolivia, Mexico and Uruguay

Roberto Gallardo del Ángel
Universidad Veracruzana
Biografía
Publicado junio 1, 2009
Palabras clave
  • pension reform,
  • substitutive reforms,
  • mixed reforms,
  • private pensions,
  • retirement policies

Resumen

This paper contains information about workers´ participation in the pension schemes in four Latin American countries which carried out structural pension reforms in 1990’s. It surveys some interesting hypotheses about the main causes that discourage participation in the new pension scheme. The main finding is that the present participation structure is strongly influenced by labor market characteristics like low-productivity and informal jobs.

Citas

  1. Abel, A. (1986), “Capital Accumulation and Uncertain Lifetimes with Adverse Selection”, Econometrica, Vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 1079-1098.
  2. Águila, G. E. (2005), “Ahorro privado, reforma de pensiones y modelo de ciclo de vida. Evidencia del imss para analizar el caso mexicano”, Consar, www.consar.gob.mx/convocatoria_2007/index.html
  3. Arenas de Mesa, A., and F. Bertranou (2005), “Previsión social: ¿Reformular o consolidar el modelo mixto?”, in Ilo, Uruguay: Empleo y protección social, de la crisis al crecimiento, pp. 397-421.
  4. Auerbach, P., M. E. Genoni and C. Pages (2005), “Social Security Coverage and Labor Markets in Developing Countries”, Working Paper 537, idb.
  5. Bertranou, F. (ed.) (2001), Cobertura previsional: Argentina, Brasil y Chile, ilo.
  6. Crabbe, C. A., (ed.) (2005), A Quarter Century of Pension Reform in Latin America and the Caribbean: Lessons Learned and Next Steps, Sustainable Development Department, idb.
  7. De la Rica, S., and T. Lemieux (1993), “Does Public Health Insurance Reduce Labor Market Flexibility or Encourage Underground Economy? Evidence from Spain and the United States”, wp 4402, nber.
  8. Enriquez, F. R. (2005), “Sostenibilidad fiscal y balance generacional: La situación de Mexico y los efectos de reformar el sistema de pensiones”, Consar, www.consar.gob.mx/convocatoria_2007/index.html
  9. Feldstein, M., and E. Ranguelova (2001), “Individual Risk in an Investment-Based Social Security System”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 4, pp. 1116-1125.
  10. Forteza, A., and N. Ferreira-Coimbra (2004), Protección Social en Uruguay: Financiamiento, cobertura y desempeño 1990-2002, ilo.
  11. Gallardo, R. (2006), “Risk Management and individual Accounts-Pension Scheme: The Mexican Case, Biwako Journal of Economics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 26-40.
  12. Gallardo, R. (2007), “An Assessment on the Pension Reforms in Latin America: Individual Participation in the Pension Schemes in Mexico and Uruguay”, International Public Economy Studies, Vol. 18.
  13. Gustman, A. L., O. Mitchell and T. Steinmeier (1994), “The Role of Pensions in the Labor Market: A Survey of the Literature”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 417-428.
  14. Holzmann, R., T. Packard and J. Cuesta (2001), “Extending Coverage in Multipillar Pension Systems: Constraints and Hypotheses, Preliminary Evidence and Future Research Agenda”, in Holzmann, R., and J.E. Stiglitz (eds.), New Ideas About Old age Security, The World Bank, pp. 452-493.
  15. Holzmann R., and J.E. Stiglitz (eds.) (2001), New Ideas About Old Age Security, The World Bank.
  16. International Labor Organization (ilo) (2005), Uruguay: Empleo y protección social, de la crisis al crecimiento.
  17. James, E. (1997), “Pension Reform: Is there any Efficiency-Equity Tradeoff?”, paper presented at the conference: “Inequality Reducing Growth in Latin America’s Market Economies“, The World Bank.
  18. Mesa-Lago, C. (2001), “Reassessing Pension Reform in Chile and Other Countries in Latin America”, International Social Security Review, No. 54:4, pp 67-92.
  19. Mesa-Lago, C. (2002), “Myth and Reality of Pension Reform: the Latin American evidence”, World Development, Vol. 30, No. 8, pp.1309-1321.
  20. Mesa-Lago, C. (2005), “Evaluation of a Quarter Century of Structural Pension Reforms in Latin America”, in Crabbe, C. A. (ed.), A Quarter Century of Pension Reform in Latin America and the Caribbean: Lessons
  21. Mitchell, O. (1996), “Social Security Reform in Uruguay: An economic assessment”, Pension Research Council, prc wp, p. 20.
  22. Murai, T. (2004), “The Foundation of the Mexican Welfare State and Social Security Reform in the 1990s”, The Developing Economies, XLII-2, pp. 262-287.
  23. Queisser, M. (1999), “Pension Reform: Lessons from Latin America”, Policy Brief No. 15, oecd Development Center.
  24. Rofman, R. (2005), “Social Security Coverage in Latin America”, social protection discussion paper, No. 0523, World Bank.
  25. Rosen, S. (1986), “The Theory of Equalizing Differences”, Handbook of Labor Economics, Chapter 12, University of Chicago.
  26. Sheshinski, E., and Y. Weis (1981), “Uncertainty and Social Security Systems”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 96, No. 2, pp. 189-206.
  27. Stiglitz, J., and P. Orszag (1999), “Rethinking Pension Reforms: 10 Myths About Social Security Systems”, World Bank conference: “New ideas about old age security”. Also in Holzmann, R., and J. E. Stiglitz (eds.), 2001, New Ideas About old age Security, The World Bank, pp.17-56.
  28. Von Gersdorff, H. (1997), “Pension Reform in Bolivia”, Policy Research Working Paper 1832, The World Bank.